Cyberwarzone

Fortinet FortiOS CVE-2020-12812: Five-Year-Old 2FA Bypass Affecting 9,700+ Exposed Firewalls Under Active Exploitation

—

by

Peter Chofield
in
Summarize with:



Two-factor authentication (2FA) is a last line of defense. But what happens when the firewall tasked with enforcing it has a case-sensitivity bug that lets attackers slip through? Fortinet’s FortiOS SSL VPN vulnerability CVE-2020-12812 does exactly that—and after five years of patches, over 9,700 unpatched instances remain exposed on the internet. In December 2025, Fortinet confirmed active exploitation in the wild. An attacker needing only to change the username case (JSMITH vs jsmith) can bypass 2FA entirely, gaining VPN or administrative access without the second factor. With 1,200+ vulnerable instances in the U.S. alone, this old flaw is proving that perimeter security—even when patched—hinges on operational discipline that defenders often lack.

Vulnerability Mechanics: CVE-2020-12812 (CVSS 5.2) stems from inconsistent case-sensitive matching in FortiGate’s local and remote authentication handlers. When a user is configured with 2FA enabled and that 2FA is set to authenticate via LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol), FortiGate treats usernames as case-sensitive. However, LDAP—the standard directory service used by enterprises—treats usernames as case-insensitive.

Attack Flow: Consider a legitimate user ‘jsmith’ with 2FA configured in the local FortiGate database. If an attacker attempts login as ‘JSMITH’ or ‘JSmith’, FortiGate does not match the username against its local 2FA-protected account. Instead, the system falls through to a secondary authentication policy: the LDAP group. If the LDAP group is configured on FortiGate and the attacker provides correct LDAP credentials (password-only, no 2FA), authentication succeeds. The system treats the LDAP-authenticated user as valid, bypassing the 2FA requirement entirely.

Exploitation Prerequisites: The vulnerability requires a specific—but common—configuration to be present:

  • Local user accounts on FortiGate with 2FA enabled, referencing LDAP as the remote authentication backend
  • Users must be members of an LDAP group on the directory server
  • At least one LDAP group must be configured on FortiGate and used in an authentication policy (e.g., admin access, SSL VPN, IPSec VPN)

Fortinet released patches in July 2020 (FortiOS 6.0.10, 6.2.4, 6.4.1). Yet as of January 2, 2026, the Shadowserver Foundation identified 9,700+ FortiGate instances exposed on the internet running unpatched versions. Geographic distribution reveals critical exposure: 1,200+ in the U.S., 714 in Taiwan, 460 in Japan, 457 in China, 402 in Thailand, and concentrations in Israel (361), India (351), Mexico (317), Hong Kong (313), and South Korea (313). This five-year-old flaw persists because patching a perimeter firewall requires coordinated maintenance windows, credential rotation, and testing—burdens that many organizations delay or skip entirely.

Attack Feasibility: An attacker does not need sophisticated tooling. A standard VPN client or SSH connection attempt with a case-altered username is sufficient. If the LDAP configuration exists and the attacker knows or can guess valid LDAP credentials (a risk in compromised identity directories), authentication succeeds without triggering 2FA. For administrative access, the impact escalates: an attacker gains firewall configuration privileges without the second factor.

2FA bypass vulnerabilities are rare and dangerous because they undermine the authentication architecture that defenders rely on most. For critical infrastructure, government agencies, financial services, and healthcare organizations running FortiGate appliances, VPN access is often a primary attack surface. A compromised VPN account without 2FA means network reconnaissance, data exfiltration, lateral movement, and ransomware deployment become viable—all without the defender recognizing a second-factor failure.

The operational risk deepens when considering threat actor sophistication. Nation-state actors (particularly those attributed to Iran) have exploited CVE-2020-12812 in past campaigns. The vulnerability’s simplicity—a username case variation—makes it trivial to automate; attackers can script tens of thousands of login attempts across exposed FortiGate instances using wordlists of leaked or purchased LDAP usernames. The fact that Fortinet observed “recent abuse” of the flaw in December 2025, five years after initial disclosure, indicates attackers are actively exploiting it again.

The defensive complexity compounds the problem. Organizations with proper change management would have patched in 2020. But many—due to legacy systems, vendor risk, or operational friction—run older FortiOS versions. For these organizations, mitigation requires either (1) upgrading to FortiOS 6.0.13 or later and running the ‘set username-case-sensitivity disable’ command, or (2) removing the secondary LDAP group configuration entirely. Both mitigations carry operational costs: upgrades introduce downtime risk, and removing LDAP groups breaks authentication workflows for some users. The result: organizational paralysis. Patches accumulate, 2FA bypass risks persist, and attackers continue exploiting.

Historical context shows the danger. U.S. government advisories in 2021 listed CVE-2020-12812 as a weaponized perimeter vulnerability. Ransomware operators have used it for initial access. The fact that 9,700+ instances remain vulnerable after five years suggests thousands of organizations worldwide are operating in a known compromised state, unaware or unwilling to remediate.

Attack Scenario – Step by Step:

1. Reconnaissance: An attacker performs shodan.io or censys.io queries to identify exposed FortiGate instances. Using internet-wide scanning results, they build a list of FortiOS versions by fingerprinting SSL/TLS certificates or HTTP response headers. They filter for vulnerable versions (pre-6.0.10, pre-6.2.4, pre-6.4.1).

2. Credential Gathering: The attacker obtains LDAP usernames from public sources (LinkedIn for organization employees, GitHub for developer emails, leaked corporate directories from past breaches, or social engineering). They assume the LDAP group exists if the organization is large enough (which most vulnerable organizations are).

3. Case-Sensitivity Bypass: Using a VPN client, SSH, or custom script, the attacker attempts login with legitimate credentials but with altered username casing (e.g., ‘[email protected]’ becomes ‘[email protected]’). FortiGate’s local user database does not match the username. The firewall checks for secondary authentication policies and finds the LDAP group configuration. The attacker provides correct LDAP credentials. LDAP authenticates the user (case-insensitive), and 2FA is never triggered because the authentication path bypassed the local 2FA policy.

4. Network Access: The attacker gains authenticated VPN access or administrative console access. Once inside, they perform lateral movement, credential harvesting, file exfiltration, or deploy malware.

Defensive Mitigations (Immediate):

  • Upgrade FortiOS: Deploy FortiOS 6.0.13, 6.2.10, 6.4.7, 7.0.1, or later. Test in staging first. Coordinate maintenance windows to minimize downtime.
  • Disable Username Case-Sensitivity: If upgrade is not immediately possible, execute ‘set username-case-sensitivity disable’ on all FortiGate CLI interfaces. This forces FortiGate to treat all username case variations identically, preventing the fallback to LDAP group authentication.
  • Remove Unnecessary LDAP Groups: If the secondary LDAP group configuration is not required for business operations, delete it from FortiGate. This eliminates the entire fallback attack vector since authentication will fail if the username does not match a local entry.
  • Audit Local User Configurations: Review all local user accounts with 2FA enabled and verify they reference only intended authentication backends. Remove orphaned LDAP group references.
  • Enforce MFA at the Identity Layer: Configure LDAP/Active Directory to enforce MFA for all users. If MFA is enforced at the directory level, the LDAP authentication path itself becomes protected.

Detection & Monitoring:

  • Monitor FortiGate logs for login attempts with abnormal username casing (e.g., mixed-case variants of known user accounts).
  • Alert on successful VPN or administrative logins that bypass 2FA prompts (if such logs are available).
  • Track authentication policy hits: unusual routing to secondary LDAP group policies may indicate exploitation attempts.
  • Use Fortinet’s FortiAnalyzer (if deployed) to correlate multiple case-varied login attempts across the same user accounts.
  • Query Shadowserver’s vulnerability dashboard to identify whether your organization’s FortiGate instances appear in the exposed list.

CVE-2020-12812 emerged during a period when enterprise perimeter security was undergoing rapid transformation. Remote work was accelerating, VPN usage was exploding, and 2FA adoption was becoming standard. Fortinet released the patch in July 2020 with adequate technical detail, making remediation straightforward for alert operators.

Yet the vulnerability persisted. Between 2021 and 2023, multiple threat actors exploited it in the wild. U.S. government agencies flagged it as a weaponized vulnerability affecting critical infrastructure. In 2022, the U.S. indicted three Iranian hackers linked to the Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) for exploiting this flaw in attacks targeting U.S. government networks, think tanks, and financial institutions. These weren’t hypothetical attackers; they were state-sponsored actors operationalizing a five-year-old authentication bypass against American critical infrastructure.

The 2021 and 2022 exploitation spree demonstrated that perimeter vulnerabilities persist not because defenders are unaware, but because operational friction outweighs urgency. Upgrading a firewall that protects an entire network requires careful planning, testing, and often coordination with vendors and service providers. For organizations managing hundreds or thousands of FortiGate appliances globally, patching becomes a multi-quarter project. In the interim, the vulnerability remains accessible.

The December 2025 advisory indicates a resurgence of active exploitation. Whether this reflects a new campaign by state-sponsored actors, opportunistic cybercriminals, or ransomware operators is unclear from Fortinet’s guidance. What is certain: five years of patch availability, documented nation-state exploitation, and widespread public awareness have not eliminated the threat. Instead, they have created a persistent vulnerability landscape in which 9,700+ instances remain exploitable—a testimony to the gap between disclosed vulnerabilities and operational remediation.

This pattern is not unique to FortiOS. Similar patterns emerged with Citrix NetScaler, Palo Alto Networks firewalls, and Cisco ASA appliances. Perimeter devices accumulate technical debt rapidly; upgrading them carries business risk, and attackers know that legacy versions persist far longer than security advisories suggest. The ecosystem has adapted: threat actors now maintain active exploitation tools and wordlists targeting old but still-prevalent firmware versions, treating long-deprecated CVEs as reliable attack infrastructure.

Primary Technical Analysis & Advisories:

Impact Assessment & Historical Context:

  • U.S. CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog – CVE-2020-12812 listed as leveraged by threat actors in attacks targeting U.S. federal agencies and critical infrastructure (2021).
  • 2022 U.S. Department of Justice Indictment – Three Iranian hackers (linked to MOIS) charged with exploiting CVE-2020-12812 in espionage campaigns against U.S. government, think tanks, and financial institutions.
  • Multiple Ransomware Operators – Documented use of CVE-2020-12812 for initial VPN access in double-extortion ransomware campaigns (2021-2023).

Exposed Instances (January 2, 2026 – Shadowserver Data):

  • Global: 9,700+ unpatched FortiGate instances
  • United States: 1,200+
  • Taiwan: 714
  • Japan: 460
  • China: 457
  • Thailand: 402
  • Israel: 361
  • India: 351
  • Mexico: 317
  • Hong Kong: 313
  • South Korea: 313

Affected FortiOS Versions (Pre-Patch): FortiOS 6.0.x (pre-6.0.10), 6.2.x (pre-6.2.4), 6.4.x (pre-6.4.1), and likely earlier legacy branches.

Patched Versions: FortiOS 6.0.13+, 6.2.10+, 6.4.7+, 7.0.1+, and all subsequent releases.

Forensic & Detection: Organizations can query their FortiGate appliance status against Shadowserver’s live dashboard to determine if they appear in the exposed instance list. Fortinet advises customers who suspect exploitation to reset all administrative and VPN user credentials and review access logs for unauthorized authentication attempts.